6.06 Gathering Information
Title and URL | Accurate? How do you know? |
Current? How do you know? |
Biased or Unbiased? Explain. |
Authority? Explain. |
Overall Reliable? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
www.archives.gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act Teaching With Documents: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Yes, the author cites other well-known, reliable sources. | Yes, it was written in 2014. | Unbiased because the other shared facts and evidence, not her own opinions. | Yes, the author has a doctorate in this field. | Yes. |
www.oyez.org/cases/2007/09-290 District of Columbia v. Heller |
Yes, the publisher used direct facts from the case. | Yes, this page was created in the last 10 years. | Not biased, as both sides are explained here, not just one. | Yes, the site is supported by many institutions, and even the government itself. | Yes. |
law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/13-1314 Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Restricting Commission |
Yes, the publisher uses direct facts from the case. | Yes, this page was published in June 2015. | Not biased, as both sides are explained here, not just one. | Yes, the site is published by Cornell. | Yes. |
archive.thinkprogress.org/how-the-supreme-court-could-repeal-the-20th-century-4f67719ac46a/ How the Supreme Court Could Repeal the 20th Century |
Yes, the author of this article cites his sources. | Yes, the article was published in March 2015. | Not biased, as the author only uses accurate facts, not his own opinion. | Yes, the author of this article was a writer for ThinkProgress. | Yes. |